What’s wrong with the Vista start menu?

I’m really undecided about the Vista start menu… since I’ve started using Vista, I’ve had several different approaches for running applications:

  1. Some applications run automatically when I log on to Windows
  2. Some applications I run manually after most logins, like e.g. Outlook. I have icons for those in the Quick Launch toolbar.
  3. I use SlickRun to run those applications I use most regularly, but which are not running all the time. The Quick Launch toolbar also has icons for some other things that I run occasionally – often enough so I want to have the accessible, but seldom enough to make me think I’m going to forget the name of a SlickRun command if I were to create one for them.
  4. I use the Start Menu with its Search functionality to run things that I use rarely.

I see how this doesn’t seem like an intuitive system, but it actually is for me.

Now, the Start Menu on Vista is really weird… it has this nice Search feature, which is very useful, but occasionally I can’t remember what the name of some item is, so I actually expand “All Programs” – and that’s where things start to go wrong. The Start Menu is so horribly slow that it’s practically unusable – it sometimes takes 20 seconds or so to expand a folder in the All Programs list. Why? No idea. I’ve been noticing the same thing on a previous Vista installation on a different machine, so it doesn’t seem to be related to my installation. It certainly has to do with the number of applications installed, but then the old Start Menu always coped with that just fine and certainly my 160GB laptop hdd can’t be home to the Vista installation with the largest number of installed apps in the world, can it?

Another thing is that even with SP1 installed, working in the Start Menu is something that sometimes crashes Explorer. Again, no idea why – it happens either when clicking around in the All Programs hierarchy, or when entering a Search term and looking through the result list. It almost seems that it’s most related to the duration I have the Start Menu open, since I don’t think it happens when I just open it, quickly select something and close it again.

I tried switching back to the Classic Start Menu, which has a nice effect on performance the list of installed apps fills the entire screen, but at least it comes up within 2 seconds or so. But the Classic Start Menu doesn’t have any features, not even those it should have according to the Options dialog – apparently it’s supposed to “store and display a list of recently opened programs”, but it doesn’t. It also doesn’t show top-level Administrative Tools, Computer or Network entries and it doesn’t support Search.

As a result, both Start Menu implementations are really unusable, though for totally different reasons. Why don’t they ever get it right?

I know there are other launcher applications out there (apart from SlickRun), but I’ve found those lacking in simple ways – I don’t want such an app to take up a lot of memory if it’s going to be running all the time, and the command features that SlickRun has are really the absolute minimum of what I need. OTOH, SlickRun doesn’t support working with the Start Menu content, which seems like a pretty useful and simple idea. Perhaps some other tools do? If I ever find time, this would be something to look into. If you know something I don’t, please comment and tell me!

1 Comment on What’s wrong with the Vista start menu?

  1. I also find the Vista start menu horribly unusable (because its slow). I use Launchy (www.launchy.net) with success in both Vista and XP (it works with the start menu).


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s