VS 2005 Image Library (the facts)

Now I’ve finally had a look at the image library that comes with VS.NET 2005 beta 2. In a previous post I had commented on the video that Aaron had made about the library, and there seemed to be a number of varying views on the topic as well as on the final contents of the library.

So what’s in it? Well, it’s part light, part dark… The icons, at least those in Windows XP format (74 are included of those), have several different formats, ranging from 16×16 to 48×48 and from 256 colours to True Colour. The icons seem to have a good quality, although the range of images provided leaves a lot to be desired. There are also a few other icons (not in the Windows XP format) of lower quality. Together with the animations, which aren’t new for the largest part but come in AVI as well as GIF versions, the icons form the “light” part of the image library.

On the other hand, the images are just as useless as I feared they would be. Most of them by far are of a kind that I can’t imagine any use for in any consumer application, they seem to be directly ripped from the VS toolbox or some similar technical source. The other huge issue is that they come only in a 16×16 resolution. Different colour depths are partly provided, as well as variants with a magenta mask and without a mask.

So my conclusion is still: ridiculous. Anyone who’s tried to improve a medium-size end user application with proper graphics knows that you need a very versatile collection of images to do that. Already today, 16×16 is an image size that’s only just usable in a toolbar or a menu, with screen sizes increasing, this will be even much worse in a year’s time. I could suggest Microsoft thinks we all write apps that need a huge number of icons with colourful bricks in a suitecase, but I rather continue suggesting that Microsoft thinks it’s not their job to provide for nice graphics to use with their development tools.

3 Comments on VS 2005 Image Library (the facts)

  1. i havnt seen the library of images yet, but i did see the film to today, i personally think its good they released these iconscos like you said microsoft arnt a graphics componany 🙂


  2. I do think it’s a good idea for them to do it. But the reason why many people have been asking for this for a long time was that the images that came with VS weren’t fit for any practical task. I don’t see anything has changed with the new library in that regard, so I think they might just as well not have bothered at all.


  3. I’d say that’s a a very subjective statement. 16×16 maybe small but if you want more objective toolbars i that size actually works fine if you use itin combination with text on your tool buttons. As you say most apps don’t have1000 icons like Office apps or VS, so the toolbar should have room for textand hotkeys…BTW, you might want to fix the textbox in the comment box here. The thing goes off into nothing on the left.


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s